Uttarakhand High Court
WPMS/2209/2009 of RIYAZ AHMAD Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND and ANOTHER on 30 December 2009
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2209 OF 2009 (MS) Riyaz Ahmad …………..Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and another. …..….Respondents. Mr. Dinesh Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, Addl. Chief Standing Counsel
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND ATNAINITAL
WRIT PETITION NO. 2209 OF 2009 (MS)
Riyaz Ahmad
…………..Petitioner.
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and another. …..….Respondents.
Mr. Dinesh Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.
Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia,J.
Heard Mr. Dinesh Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.
The petitioner has filed this writ petition with the prayer that he has made an application to the District Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar for grant of an arm-licence on 20.9.2007, which is pending with him for last two years and has not been decided as yet.
Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand, who is representing the State, has stated that the matter may be disposed of with appropriate direction to the concerned District Magistrate.
In view of the aforesaid submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as respondents, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the District Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar/respondent no. 2 to decide the application of the petitioner for grant of arm-licence as expeditiously as possible.
With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.
(Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.)