Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/24031/2016 of S.VIJAYA, Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, on 29 December 2016
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Ninth day of December Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice R.MAHADEVAN CRL OP(MD) No.24031 of 2016 1 S.VIJAYA, 2 M.RAJA, 3 M.LAKSHMI AMMAL, ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Thursday, the Twenty Ninth day of December Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice R.MAHADEVAN
CRL OP(MD) No.24031 of 2016
1 S.VIJAYA,
2 M.RAJA,
3 M.LAKSHMI AMMAL, ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED
Vs
THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VALANDOOR POLICE STATION, VALANDOOR, USILAMPATTI TALUK, MADURAI DISTRICT.
(IN CR.NO.134/2016) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.P.BALAN Advocate
For Respondent : MR.P.KANDASAMY Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused, inCrime No.134 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police, apprehendarrest at the hands of the respondent police for the allegedoffences punishable under Sections 294(b) and 506(i) of IPC andhence, seek anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners scoldedand threatened the defacto complainant.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and thelearned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondent/State.
4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) on instructionssubmitted that no one was injured in the incident and that theinvestigation is pending.
5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and alsoconsidering the fact that no-body is injured in the allegedoccurrence, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to thepetitioners, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitionershttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or ontheir appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Usilampatti, Madurai, and on each of them executing a bond for a sumof Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties eachfor a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrateconcerned and on further condition that the petitioner No.2 shallappear before the respondent police daily twice at 10.30 a.m., and05.30 p.m for a period of four weeks and thereafter as and whenrequired for interrogation and the petitioners 1 and 3 shall appearbefore the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period offour weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation.The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated underSection 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.
6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistratewithin a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copymade ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail standsdismissed.
sd/-
29/12/2016
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, USILAMPATTI, MADURAI
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MADURAI DISTRICT
3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VALANDOOR POLICE STATION, VALANDOOR, USILAMPATTI TALUK, MADURAI DISTRICT.
4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI
+1. CC to M/S.P.BALAN Advocate SR.No.83641
GJM/CK/SAR-3-30.12.16-2P-6C
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.24031 of 2016
Date :29/12/2016