CRL OP(MD)/23490/2013 of DR. G. MEENAKSHI Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2013

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )

Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand ThirteenPRESENT

The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH

CRL OP(MD) No.23490 of 2013

DR. G. MEENAKSHI ... PETITIONER/ ACCUSED nO.2

Vs

THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI CITY, CRIME NO.28/2013, TIRUNELVELI DT ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT

For Petitioner : M/S.K. PRABHU Advocate

For Respondent : Mr.A.P.Balasubramani Government Advocate ( Crl. Side)

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner / A2 apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondentpolice for the alleged commission of offences under Sections 376 and 506(ii) of IPC., and Sections 4,6 and 7 of Protection of Children from SexualOffences Act, 2012, in Crime No.28 of 2013, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the first accused by nameSelvan had committed an offence of rape on a minor girl. Thereafter, theparents of the victim have approached the Doctor for abortion and it isalleged that the Doctor had performed surgery resulting in miscarriage.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit thatthe petitioner is nothing todo with the alleged commission of offence andhe has been falsely implicated in this case.

4. The learned Government Advocate (crl.side) would submit that thepetitioner herein is the Doctor, who has been charged along with anotherperson as second accused in this case and the investigation is pending.

5. This Court, taking into consideration of the above said facts andcircumstances, is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in theevent of arrest or on his appearance before the learned JudicialMagistrate No.V, Tirunelveli and on executing a bond for a sum ofRs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a likesum to the satisfaction of thelearned Magistrate concerned and onfurther condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondenthttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/daily, as and when required. The petitioner shall comply with thecondition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate withina period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made readyfailing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 30/12/2013

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar

TO

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NOV, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI.

3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI CITY, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S.K. PRABHU Advocate SR.No.23490.

TS/31.12.2013/2P-6C