Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/19585/2019 of M.Neyna Mohamadhu Vs The Inspector of Police on 30 December 2019
No.19585 of 2019 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 30/12/2019 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice T.KRISHNAVALLI CRL OP(MD). No.19585 of 2019 M.Neyna Mohamadhu ... Petitioner/3rd Accused Vs State through The Inspector of Police, Sellur Police Station,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )Date : 30/12/2019PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice T.KRISHNAVALLI
M.Neyna Mohamadhu ... Petitioner/3[rd] Accused
Vs
State throughThe Inspector of Police,Sellur Police Station, Madurai.
(In Crime No.1600 of 2019). ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.A.Manomani Advocate.
For Respondent : Mr.A.Robinson, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C
PRAYER :-
For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.1600 of 2019 on the file ofthe Respondent Police.
ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondentpolice for the alleged offences punishable under sections 147, 294(b), 325 and 506(2) of IPC and Section 4 of TNPHW Act, 2002 in CrimeNo.1600 of 2019 on the file of the respondent police and hence,seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that due to dispute arise inorder to put road side stall, the petitioner along with accusedNos.1 and 2 and two un-known persons attacked the defactocomplainant and thereby caused injuries. Hence, the complaint.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that thepetitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed anyoffence as alleged by the prosecution.https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for theState submitted that the injured has been discharged from thehospital.
5. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case andalso considering the fact that the injured has been discharged fromthe hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail tothe petitioner with certain conditions.
6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bailin the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learnedJudicial Magistrate No.II, Madurai and on his executing a bond for asum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) along with twosureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learnedMagistrate concerned and the petitioner shall appear before therespondent police daily at 10.00 a.m and 05.00 pm, until furtherorders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulatedunder Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.
7. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistratewithin a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copymade ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail standsdismissed.
30/12/2019
TO
1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, MADURAI
2 DO-THROUGH : THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI DISTRICT.
3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SELLUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI.
4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC to M/S.M.MOHAMED SHERBUDEEN, Advocate SR.No.11
MSA/RMKES/VR/SAR 1/02.01.2020/2P/6Chttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/