Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/23563/2013 of B.DURAI PANDI Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2013
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.23563 of 2013 B.DURAI PANDI ..PETITIONER/ACCUSED (RANK NOT KNOWN) Vs. STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KEELAVALAVU
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
( Criminal Jurisdiction )Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand ThirteenPRESENTThe Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASHCRL OP(MD) No.23563 of 2013
B.DURAI PANDI
..PETITIONER/ACCUSED(RANK NOT KNOWN)
Vs.
STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KEELAVALAVU POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.CR. NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2013...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.K.J.ASSOCIATES AdvocateFor Respondent : Mr.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondentpolice for the alleged commission of offences punishable under sections379 of I.P.C. read with Section 4(1) 4(2) and 21(1)(V) of the Mines andMineral Development and Regulation Act, in Crime No.not known of 2013 onthe file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. It is alleged by the petitioner that he is the owner of thevehicle bearing registration No.TN 59 BZ 4754 and TN 65 Z 0891, which isinvolved in the commission of offence on 22.12.2013 and the firstinformation report was registered on the same day for the above saidoffences.
3. The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) would submit thatthe contraband has been seized and there is no previous case against thepetitioner.
4. In the facts and circumstances of the case, since the petitioneris the owner of the vehicle and no previous case against him, this Courtis inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certainconditions.
5. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail, inthe event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned JudicialMagistrate, Melur and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to thesatisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further conditionthat the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police for aperiod of two weeks and thereafter as and when required forinterrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the conditionsstipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate withina period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made readyfailing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 30/12/2013 / TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)
TO1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MELUR, MADURAI DISTRICT.
2 -DO-THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI.
3 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI.
4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,KEELAVALAVU POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.
+1. CC to M/S.K.J.ASSOCIATES Advocate SR.No.15 ORDER IN
CRL OP(MD) No.23563 of 2013
Date :30/12/2013
PBK 02/01/2014 2P/6C