CRL OP(MD)/23677/2013 of GOWSHICK Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2013

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )

Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand ThirteenPRESENT

The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH

CRL OP(MD) No.23677 of 2013

1 GOWSHICK

2 GOWTHAM

3 ILAYARAJA

4 SATHISHKUMAR

5 PANDIAMMAL

6 M. MALATHI ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSEDNOS.1,2,3,4,7 & 9

Vs

THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MELUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.

CRIME NO.612 OF 2013 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

For Petitioner : M/S.AK.AZAGARSAMI Advocate For Respondent : M/S.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI, Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side)

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 4, 7 and 9 apprehending arrestat the hands of the respondent police for the alleged commission ofoffences punishable under sections 147, 148, 341, 294(b), 323, 324 &506(ii) of IPC and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Women Harassment Act, inCrime No.612 of 2013 on the file of the respondent police seekanticipatory bail.

2.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that thefirst petitioner/A1 had fallen love with the daughter of the de-facto complainant and subsequently, he refused to marry her.Consequently, all the accused attacked the de-facto complainant'sparty, resulting in registration of this case against the accused.

3.The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) would submitthat this is a case of no injury.

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and alsoconsidering the fact that no injury has been caused by thehttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/petitioners, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners onanticipatory bail.

5.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released onbail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before thelearned Judicial Magistrate, Melur, and on each of them executing abond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with twosureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learnedMagistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitionersshall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. for aperiod of two weeks and thereafter as and when required. Thepetitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section438 Cr.P.C., scrupulously.

6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistratewithin a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copymade ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail standsdismissed.

sd/-

30/12/2013

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MELUR.

2 -DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MELUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,

MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.AK.AZAGARSAMI Advocate SR.No.30