Madras High Court

CRL OP(MD)/23665/2013 of P. SURESH @ KOODASALI Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2013

Cites 0, Cited by 0

BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.23665 of 2013 1 P. SURESH @ KOODASALI 2 P. JAPPAN RAJA @ KRISHNAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs THE STATE

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )

Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT

THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH

CRL OP(MD) No.23665 of 2013

1 P. SURESH @ KOODASALI 2 P. JAPPAN RAJA @ KRISHNAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN

Vs

THE STATE REP.BY

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TALLAKULAM POLICE STATION, MADURAI, CRIME NO.1438/2013 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

FOR PETITIONER : M/S.B.SUDHA SATHYANAND ADVOCATEFOR RESPONDENT : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN GOVT. ADVOCATE ( CRL. SIDE)

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL UNDER SEC. 438 CR.P.C.

ORDER : THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER :- The petitioners/Accused apprehending arrest at the hands of therespondent police for the alleged commission of offences punishable undersections 147, 148, 341, 294(b), 323, 324 & 506(ii) of IPC in CrimeNo.1438 of 2013 on the file of the respondent police seek anticipatorybail.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners.

3.The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) would submit thatinjured has been discharged from the hospital.

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and alsoconsidering the fact that injured has been discharged from the hospital,this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail.

5.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail inthe event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned JudicialMagistrate No.II, Madurai, and on each of them executing a bond for a sumhttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for alike sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondentpolice daily at 10.30 a.m for a period of two weeks and thereafter as andwhen required. The petitioners shall comply with the conditionstipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C., scrupulously.

6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate withina period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready,failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/-

30/12/2013

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, MADURAI.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TALLAKULAM POLICE STATION, MADURAI.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,

MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.B.SUDHA SATHYANAND Advocate SR.No.64389.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

IN

CRL OP(MD) No.23665 of 2013

Date :30/12/2013

2P/6CRPB 02.01.2014

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead