Rhett Precedent

Uttarakhand High Court

WPSS/211/2000 of PRAMOD KUMAR and ANR. Vs STATE and ORS. on 15 December 2000

of 2000(S/S) Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Heard learned Chief Standing Counsel and the learned counsel for the petitioner and in their agreement the petition is being disposed of . Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that work and post are available. If the work and post are available then

Arguments

W.P. No. 211 of 2000(S/S)

Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J.

Heard learned Chief Standing Counsel and the learned counsel for the petitioner and in their agreement the petition is being disposed of.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that work and post are available. If the work and post are available then the case of the petitioner shall be considered. With the aforesaid direction the writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/-

Dt. 15.12.2000

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead