CRL OP(MD)/24167/2016 of SENTHIL KUMAR, Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, on 29 December 2016

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )

Thursday, the Twenty Ninth day of December Two Thousand SixteenPRESENT

The Hon`ble Mr Justice R.MAHADEVAN

CRL OP(MD) No.24167 of 2016

SENTHIL KUMAR, ... PETITIONER /SOLE ACCUSED

Vs

STATE REP.BYTHE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KARIMEDU POLICE STATION, MADURAI CITY. IN CR.NO.862/2016 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

For Petitioner : M/S.M.JEGADEESH PANDIAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.P.KANDASAMY Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as sole accused, in CrimeNo.862 of 2016, on the file of the respondent police, apprehendsarrest at the hands of the respondent police for the allegedoffences punishable under Section 3(1) of TNPPDL Act and hence,seeks anticipatory bail.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learnedGovernment Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondent / State.

3. The case of the prosecution is that during midnight of18.11.2016, the de facto complainant's vehicle bearing registrationNo.TN58 AK0033 was set fire.

4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submittedthat the petitioner has not committed any such offence and he hasnothing to do with present case and he has been falsely implicatedin this case.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, thisCourt is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, withcertain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to bereleased on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance beforehttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/the learned Judicial Magistrate No.V, Madurai, and on his executinga bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learnedMagistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitionershall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., and05.30 p.m., for a period of four weeks and thereafter as and whenrequired for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with thecondition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistratewithin a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copymade ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail standsdismissed.

sd/-

29/12/2016

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.V, MADURAI

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRTE MADURAI DISTRICT

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KARIMEDU POLICE STATION, MADURAI CITY.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.M.JEGADEESH PANDIAN Advocate SR.No.24

GJM/SKS/RR/SAR-2-3.1.17-2P-6C