Rhett Precedent

Uttarakhand High Court

WPMS/210/2000 of G.M HILL REGION U.P.C.L Vs BALWANT SINGH and ANOTHER on 15 December 2000

of 2000 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Any finding of the labour court has not been shown to be preferred therefore no interference is called for under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The writ petition is dismissed accordingly. (P.C. Verma, J.)

Conclusion

WPMS No. 210 of 2000

Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

Any finding of the labour court has not been shown to be preferred therefore no interference is called for under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The writ petition is dismissed accordingly.

(P.C. Verma, J.)

Date:- 15.12.2000

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead