Uttarakhand High Court
WPMS/1449/2018 of HARI SHANKER Vs RAKESH KUMAR on 31 December 2024
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPMS 1449/2018 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Vinod Tiwari, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Kurban Ali, Advocate, for the respondents. (2)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
|**SL.**<br>**No**|**Date**|**Office Notes,**<br>**reports, orders**<br>**or proceedings**<br>**or directions and**<br>**Registrar’s order**<br>**with Signatures**||**COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS**| |---|---|---|---|---| |||||**W PMS 1 4 4 9 / 2 0 1 8**<br>**Hon’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.**<br>Mr. Vinod Tiwari, Advocate, for<br>the petitioners.<br>Mr. Kurban Ali, Advocate, for<br>the respondents.<br>(2)<br>Petitioners filed an application<br>for issuing a Commission before the<br>learned<br>Additional<br>District<br>Judge,<br>Kotdwar in Civil Revision No. 18 of 2017.<br>Since the said application was rejected,<br>therefore, they have approached this<br>Court challenging the rejection order.<br>(3)<br>As<br>per<br>the<br>report<br>dated<br>18.11.2024, received from Civil Judge<br>(Sr.<br>Div.),<br>Kotdwar,<br>District<br>Pauri<br>Garhwal, Civil Suit No. 112 of 2015 was<br>decided on 3.3.2021.<br>(4)<br>After<br>decision<br>in<br>the<br>suit,<br>challenge to interlocutory order passed in<br>a revision, do not survive. Accordingly,<br>writ petition is dism issed.<br>**( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.)**<br>**3 1 .1 2 .2 0 2 4**<br>Pr|