Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/23495/2013 of VANAPETCHI Vs THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2013
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.23495 of 2013 VANAPETCHI ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED No.1 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE SEDAPATTY POLICE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand ThirteenPRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH
CRL OP(MD) No.23495 of 2013
VANAPETCHI ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED No.1
Vs
THE STATE REP.BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE SEDAPATTY POLICE STATION,MADURAI DISTRICT.
(CR.NO.203 OF 2013) ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.S.MUNIYANDI Advocate For Respondent : M/S.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN, Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who was remanded to the judicial custody by therespondent police on 10.12.2013 for the alleged offence underSection 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii) (B) of NDPS Act in Crime No.203 of 2013on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.
2. It is the case of the prosecution that the petitioner wasin possession of 2.500 kgs of ganja at the time raid.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submitthat the petitioner has been in judicial custody from 10.12.2013 andthere is no recovery from this petitioner as per the prosecution andhe prays for bail.
4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that thepetitioner has two previous cases.https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
5. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner andthe learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State andalso perused the materials available on record.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case thisCourt is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail on thefollowing conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed tobe released on bail on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum tothe satisfaction of the learned Additional District Judge ofPrincipal Special Court for EC & NDPS Act cases, Madurai, and onfurther condition that the petitioner shall stay at Trichy andappear before Trichy Cantonement Police Station daily at 10.30 a.muntil further orders.
sd/-
30/12/2013
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1 THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE OF PRINCIPAL SPECIAL COURT FOR EC & NDPS ACT CASES, MADURAI. FOR EC & NDPS ACT CASES, MADURAI.
2 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SEDAPATTY POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT. MADURAI DISTRICT.
3 THE OFFICER IN-CHARGE,TRICHY CANTONEMENT POLICE STATION, TRICHY.
4 THE OFFICER IN-CHARGE, WOMEN PRISON, NILAKOTTAI.
5 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
CRL OP(MD) No.23495 of 2013
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/