Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/19610/2019 of A.Selvakumar Vs The Inspector of Police on 30 December 2019
No.19610 of 2019 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 30/12/2019 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice T.KRISHNAVALLI CRL OP(MD). No.19610 of 2019 A.Selvakumar ... Petitioner/Sole Accused Vs The Inspector of Police, Mamsapuram Town Police Station, Virudhunagar
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )Date : 30/12/2019
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice T.KRISHNAVALLI
CRL OP(MD). No.19610 of 2019
A.Selvakumar ... Petitioner/Sole Accused
Vs
The Inspector of Police,Mamsapuram Town Police Station, Virudhunagar District. (Crime No.184/2019). ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.S.M.Anantha Murugan,Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.A.Robinson, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C
PRAYER :-
For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. 184/2019 on the file of theRespondent Police.
ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondentpolice for the alleged offences punishable under sections 294(b) and506(ii) of IPC and Section 4 of the TNPWH Act in Crime No.184 of2019 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeksanticipatory bail.
2.The case of the prosecution is that on 18.12.2019 the defactocomplainant went to the Administrative of the School and requestedto provide employment which is proposed to be filled by theManagement of the School. At that time, the petitioner and othersabused the defacto complainant with filthy language and alsothreatened to her. Hence, the complaint.
3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that thepetitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed anyoffence as alleged by the prosecution.
4.Heard the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearingfor the State.
5.Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case,this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitionerwith certain conditions.https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bailin the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learnedJudicial Magistrate No.II, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar District andon his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees TenThousand only) along with two sureties each for a like sum to thesatisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and the petitionershall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m untilfurther orders. The petitioner shall comply with the conditionstipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.
7.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistratewithin a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copymade ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail standsdismissed.
sd/-
30/12/2019
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II SRIVILLIPUTHUR, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT
2 DO-THROUGH : THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VIRUTHUNAGAR DISTRICT AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR.
3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MAMSAPURAM TOWN POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.
4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1 CC to M/s.S.M.ANANTHA MURUGAN,Advocate(SR-22545 dated 30/12/2019)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
CRL OP(MD) No.19610 of 2019
Date :30/12/2019
MSA/RMKES/JC/SAR 4/03.01.2020/2P/6Chttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/