Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/24104/2016 of CHANDRASEKAR, Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, on 29 December 2016
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Ninth day of December Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice R.MAHADEVAN CRL OP(MD) No.24104 of 2016 CHANDRASEKAR ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.3 Vs THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PARAMAKUDI TOWN
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Thursday, the Twenty Ninth day of December Two Thousand SixteenPRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice R.MAHADEVAN
CRL OP(MD) No.24104 of 2016
CHANDRASEKAR ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.3
Vs
THE STATE REP. BYTHE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PARAMAKUDI TOWN POLICE STATION,RAMNAD DISTRICT.
CR.NO.586 OF 2016 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
FOR PETITIONER : M/S.M.S.JEYAKARTHIK, ADVOCATE
FOR RESPONDENT : Mr.P.KANDASAMY, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE ( CRL. SIDE)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as A-3, in Crime No.586 of 2016on the file of the respondent police, apprehends arrest at the handsof the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable underSections 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) of IPC and hence, seeksanticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that due to previous motive,the accused persons abused the defacto complainant with filthylanguages and also assaulted him by hands.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learnedGovernment Advocate(Crl. Side) for the respondent/State.
4.The learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) appearing for therespondent on instructions submitted that the injured has beendischarged from the hospital.
5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and alsoconsidering the fact that the injured has been discharged from thehospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to thehttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/petitioner, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner isordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Paramakudi, andon his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees TenThousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to thesatisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on furthercondition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondentpolice daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of four weeks andthereafter as and when required for interrogation. The petitionershall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C.scrupulously.
6.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistratewithin a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copymade ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail standsdismissed.
sd/-
29/12/2016
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PARAMAKUDI.
2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.
3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PARAMAKUDI TOWN POLICE STATION, RAMNAD DISTRICT.
4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC to M/S.M.S.JEYAKARTHIK Advocate SR.No. 83815
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.24104 of 2016
Date :29/12/2016
JIKR/PMU
TE/CK/SAR-I : 30/12/2016 : 2P/6C