Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRWP/10995/2020 of RENU @ AYAT SHAIKH AND ANR Vs STATE OF UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH AND ORS on 31 December 2020
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP No.10995 of 2020 (O&M) Date of Decision: 31.12.2020 Renu @ Ayat Shaikh and Another ..…... Petitioner(s) V/s. State of Union Territory Chandigarh and Others ….....Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP No.10995 of 2020 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 31.12.2020
Renu @ Ayat Shaikh and Another
.....e Petitioner(s) |V/s]
State of Union Territory Chandigarh and Others ws. Respondent(s) |
CORAMHON)BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI
Present:Mr. Satinder Kumar Garg, Advocatefor the petitioner(s).
RRR
Through Video Conference
Jasgurpreet Singh Puri, J.(Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners areof marriageable age and they have married each other with their voluntary consentand they are apprehending threat at the hands of the private respondents.
Notice of motion.
On the asking of Court, Mr. Rajiv Anand, Additional PP, U.T..Chandigarh accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos.|1 to 3. Mr. Anand statesthat the address which has been given by the petitioners is not a valid address and|colony as mentioned was under demolition during COVID-19.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners,themselves will present before the respondent No.3-SHO, P.S. Industrial Area,|Phase-1, Chandigarh.
In view of the above, it is directed that in case the present petitioners appear before the aforesaid SHO-respondent No.3 then SHO shall assess the threat|
purpose of considering the threat of life and liberty to the petitioners and does not|
reflect anything on the validity of marriage. |
Disposed of, accordingly.
31[St ]December, 2020Sonia PurlWhether speaking/reasoned: Yes/NoWhether reportable: Yes/No (Jasgurpreet Singh Pur) |JUDGE