Uttarakhand High Court

WPPIL/205/2016 of Ravindra Jugran Vs Chief Election Commissioner Of India AND OTHERS on 30 December 2016

205 of 2016 Hon’ble Rajiv Sharma, J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Mr. M.C. Pant, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Anjali Bhargava, Advocate for the respondent no.1. Mr. Sanjay Bhatt, Advocate for the respondent no. 2. Mr. B.D. Kandpal, Dy.A.G. for the State/respondent no.3.

WPPIL No. 205 of 2016Hon’ble Rajiv Sharma, J.Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.

Mr. M.C. Pant, Advocate for the

petitioner.

Ms. Anjali Bhargava, Advocate for the respondent no.1.

Mr. Sanjay Bhatt, Advocate for the respondent no. 2.

Mr. B.D. Kandpal, Dy.A.G. for the State/respondent no.3.

Petitioner has already made a representation on 17.12.216 to the Election Commission. It is for the Election Commission to decide the representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law.

In view of the above, writ petition stands disposed of.

(Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.)

(Rajiv Sharma, J.)

30.12.2016

NISHANT

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead