Madras High Court

CRL OP(MD)/23605/2013 of ANBURAJ @ ANBAIAH Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2013

Cites 0, Cited by 0

BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.23605 of 2013 ANBURAJ @ ANBAIAH ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SURANDAI

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )

Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT

THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH

CRL OP(MD) No.23605 of 2013

ANBURAJ @ ANBAIAH ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN

Vs

THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SURANDAI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

CRIME NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2013. ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

FOR PETITIONER : M/S.M.SARAVANAN ADVOCATEFOR RESPONDENT : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL UNDER SEC. 438 CR.P.C.

ORDER : THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondentpolice for the alleged offence punishable under sections 294(b) and 506(ii) of I.P.C and seeks anticipatory bail.

2. Learned Government Advocate (crl. Side) submitted that based onthe complaint given by the de-facto complainant, petition enquiry isbeing conducted.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted thatthere was a wordy quarrel between the petitioner and the defactocomplainant with regard to a pathway and a civil suit in O.S.No.569 of2013 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Tenkasi is alsopending.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Courtis inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in theevent of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicialhttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/Magistrate, Senkottai and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further conditionthat the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at10.00 a.m for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required.The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

5. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate withina period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made readyfailing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/-

30/12/2013

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SENKOTTAI.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SURANDAI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC TO M/S.M.SARAVANAN ADVOCATE SR.NO.64424.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

IN

CRL OP(MD) No.23605 of 2013

Date :30/12/2013

2P/6CRPB 30.12.2013

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead