Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/23603/2013 of MUTHUKUTTI NARAYANAN @ RAJA Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2013
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.23603 of 2013 MUTHUKUTTI NARAYANAN @ RAJA ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.2 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand ThirteenPRESENTThe Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH
CRL OP(MD) No.23603 of 2013
MUTHUKUTTI NARAYANAN @ RAJA ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.2
Vs
THE STATE REP.BYTHE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ETTAIYAPURAM POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DT. CR. NO. 78/2013. ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.M.MICHAEL BHARATHI AdvocateFor Respondent : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/Accused No.2 apprehending arrest at the hands of therespondent police for the alleged commission offences punishable undersections 147, 341, 307 and 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.78 of 2013 on thefile of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail.
2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that thepetitioner is an innocent person and he is no way connected with thealleged occurrence. He would further submit that the remaining accusedin this case have already been granted anticipatory bail.
3.The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) would submit thatno one is injured in this case.
4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and alsoconsidering the fact that no one is injured in this case, this Court isinclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail.5.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail inthe event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned JudicialMagistrate No.II, Kovilpatti, and on executing a bond for a sum ofRs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a likesum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and onfurther condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondentpolice daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter ashttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/and when required. The petitioner shall comply with the conditionstipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C., scrupulously.
6.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate withina period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready,failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.
sd/- 30/12/2013 / TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II,KOVILPATTI.
2.DO THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THOOTHUKUDI.
3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
ETTAIYAPURAM POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.
+1. CC to M/S.M.MICHAEL BHARATHI Advocate SR.No.81
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.23603 of 2013
Date :30/12/2013
RG.03.01.2014 2P/6C.