Madras High Court

TC/120/1998 of THE COMMR .I.T Vs A.S.RUKMANI AMMAL on 25 November 2002

Cites 0, Cited by 0

BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT %DATED: 06.03.2019 *CORAM THE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

?BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT%DATED: 06.03.2019*CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE+Crl.O.P.(MD)No.3432 of 2019

#Sharmila

: Petitioner

Vs.

$1.The Superintendent of Police,Office of the Superintendent of Police,Kanyakumari District, Kanyakumari.

2.The Inspector of Police,Thackalai Police Station,Kanyakumari District.

3.T.Rajesh : Respondents

PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., todirect the respondents 1 and 2 to provide adequate police protection to thepetitioner and her son-s life and limb based on the petitioner-srepresentation dated 15.02.2019 and investigate the matter.

!For Petitioner : Mr.P.Ramesh

^For R~1 and R~2 : Mr.A.P.G.Ohm Chairma PrabhuGovernment Advocate (Crl.Side)

:ORDER

This present petition is filed to direct the respondents 1 and 2 toprovide adequate police protection to the petitioner and her son-s life andlimb based on the petitioner-s representation dated 15.02.2019 andinvestigate the matter.

2. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learnedGovernment Advocate appearing for the respondent police.

3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that on a promisemade by the third respondent, who according to her, is serving in the armedforces, she had physical relationship with him. Now, she faces threat on herlife and liberty.

4. The learned Government Advocate submitted that the complaint given bythe petitioner is pending.

5. The second respondent is directed to cause necessary enquiry on thepending complaint and take such appropriate decision as may be necessary toprovide police protection to the life and liberty of the petitioner.Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

To

1. The Superintendent of Police,Office of the Superintendent of Police,Kanyakumari District, Kanyakumari.

2. The Inspector of Police,Thackalai Police Station,Kanyakumari District.

3. The Government Advocate (Crl.Side),Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,Madurai.

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead