Uttarakhand High Court
CTR/66/2022 of STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH COMMISSIONER STATE COMMERCIAL TAX Vs ESSGEE INDUSTRIES,10-11 on 23 December 2022
Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS CTR No.66 of 2022 Shri Vipin Sanghi, C.J. Shri Ramesh Chandra Khulbe, J. Mr. Pradeep Joshi, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the
|**SL.**<br>**No**|**Date**|**Office Notes,**<br>**reports, orders or**<br>**proceedings or**<br>**directions and**<br>**Registrar’s order**<br>**with Signatures**||**COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS**| |---|---|---|---|---| |||||CTR No.66 of 2022<br>**Shri Vipin Sanghi, C.J.**<br> <br>**Shri Ramesh Chandra Khulbe, J.**<br>Mr. Pradeep Joshi, learned Additional<br>Chief<br>Standing<br>Counsel<br>for<br>the<br>State/revisionist.<br>Mr. S.K. Posti, learned senior counsel<br>assisted by Mr. Ashutosh Posti, learned for<br>the Caveator.<br>**Delay Condonation Application (I.A. No. 1 of 2022)**<br>The present commercial tax revision<br>has been preferred by the Department to<br>assail the order dated 08.05.2019.<br>There is a delay of 1227 days in<br>preferring the present revision petition.<br>The<br>revisionist<br>has<br>preferred<br>an<br>application to seek condonation of delay.<br>The only explanation furnished is that<br>English<br>translation<br>of<br>the<br>relevant<br>documents were not available.<br>In our view that does not explain the<br>immense delay of 1227 days.<br>The tax effect in the present revision<br>is to the tune of Rs.4,52,386/- only.<br>Keeping in view these facts, we are<br>not inclined to condone the delay.<br>The<br>application<br>is<br>accordingly<br>rejected. Consequently,<br>the<br>revision<br>petition<br>is<br>dismissed<br>as<br>barred<br>by<br>limitation.<br>**(R.C. Khulbe, J.) (Vipin Sanghi, C.J.)**<br>23.12.2022<br>BS/SK|
Page 1 of 1
Loading citations and judicial treatment…