Madras High Court

CRL OP/29040/2023 of RAMU @ RAMACHANDRAN Vs INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 29 December 2023

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 29.12.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL

Criminal Original Petition No. 29040 of 2023

Ramu @ Ramachandran, M/A29,S/o.Rajendran,No.27, Throwpathy Amman Koil Street,M.N. Kuppam, Pallithennal PO,Villupuram District.

...Petitioner/Accused

Versus

The State represented by The Inspector of Police,Thirubuvanai Police Station,Puducherry District.

Cr. No. 154 of 2023

...Respondent

PRAYER:Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Thirubuvanai P.S. Crime No. 154 of 2023 on the file of respondent police pending investigation.

For Petitioner : Mr. U. Yuvaraj.

For Respondent : Mr. K.S. Mohandass,

Public Prosecutor (Puducherry) assisted by Mr. A. Alexander.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

The petitioner seeks bail in Crime No. 154 of 2023 on the file of respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 448, 427, 506(ii) read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908. The petitioner was arrested and remanded to custody on 06.11.2023.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with the other accused had trespassed into the Arrack shop and abused the defacto complainant in filthy language and hurled the arrack bottles into the shop and caused injuries to the defacto complainant and damaged the motorcycle parked inside the arrack shop and hence has committed the offence under Sections 294(b), 323, 448, 427, 506(ii) read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908

3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has nothing to do with the alleged offence. He further submits that no previous case is pending against the petitioner and he is languishing in jail from 06.11.2023.

4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the petitioner along with other accused had trespassed into the Arrack shop and hurled the arrack bottles into the shop and caused injuries to the defacto complainant and damaged the motorcycle. It is further submitted that the investigation is not yet completed and thus, opposed for granting bail to the petitioner.

5. Considering the rival submissions on either side and also considering the fact that no previous case is pending against the petitioner and also considering the period of incarceration, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate IV, Puducherry and on further conditions that :-

[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar cards or Bank pass Books to ensure their identity;Aadhar cards or Bank pass Books to ensure their identity; [b]the petitioner shall report before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Puducherry everyday at 10.30 a.m. until further orders.No.IV, Puducherry everyday at 10.30 a.m. until further orders.

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [d]the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;investigation or trial;

[e] on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

[f] if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

ay/ssa

29.12.2023

To

1. The Judicial Magistrate IV,

Puducherry.

2. The Central Prison, Kalapet, Puducherry. Kalapet, Puducherry.

3. The Inspector of Police, Thirubuvanai Police Station, Puducherry District.

4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. High Court of Madras.

Crl.O.P.No.29040 of 2023

P. DHANABAL, Jay/ssa

Crl.O.P. No. 29040 of 2023

Dated: 29.12.2023

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead