Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/23667/2013 of N. INPARAJ Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2013
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.23667 of 2013 N. INPARAJ ... PETITIONER/ ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TOWN POLICE STATION, SIVAKASI,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand ThirteenPRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH
CRL OP(MD) No.23667 of 2013
N. INPARAJ ... PETITIONER/ ACCUSED
Vs
THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TOWN POLICE STATION, SIVAKASI, VIRUDHUANGAR DISTRICT.
(CRIME NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2013) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.S.SELVAKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : M/S.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN, Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is arrayed as an accused and apprehending arrestat the hands of the respondent police for the alleged commission ofoffences punishable under sections 406 and 420 IPC, seeksanticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner is amanufacturer of school note books in the name and style of' 'MalarPrinto Graph'. The defacto complainant has approached thepetitioner/accused for printing some note books, on account which,there was a dispute in the transaction.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submitthat the complaint itself is false and concocted and the petitionerhas nothing to do with the alleged commission of offence.
4. Learned Government Advocate (crl. side) would submit thatthe petition enquiry is pending.https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
5. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner andthe learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) appearing for the stateand also perused the entire materials available on record.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case andsince it appears to be a purely civil transaction, this is a fitcase for granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly,the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event ofarrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate,Sivakasi and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupeesten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to thesatisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on furthercondition that the petitioner shall report before the respondentpolice daily at 11.00 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter,as and when required, for interrogation. The petitioner shallcomply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C.scrupulously.
7. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistratewithin a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copymade ready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail standsdismissed.
TO
1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SIVAKASI, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.2 -DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VIRUDHUNAGAR @ SRIVILLIPUTHUR
3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TOWN POLICE STATION, SIVAKASI, VIRUDHUANGAR DISTRICT.
4 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC to M/S.S.SELVAKUMAR Advocate SR.No.64480.
msm 31.12.2013 p2/6c