Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/23588/2013 of MURUGESAN Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2013
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.23588 of 2013 MURUGESAN ..PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2 Vs. STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PATTUKOTTAI P.E.W., THANJAVUR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand ThirteenPRESENTThe Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASHCRL OP(MD) No.23588 of 2013
MURUGESAN
Vs.
..PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2
STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PATTUKOTTAI P.E.W., THANJAVUR DISTRICT.(CR.NO.721 OF 2013)..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.S.DEENADHAYALAN Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is the Accused No.2 and apprehending arrest at thehands of the respondent police for the alleged commission of offencesunder Sections 4(1)(a), 24(i) and 4(1-A) of TNP Act and Section 272 and420 of IPC., in Crime No.721 of 2013, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that when the respondent conducteda surprise raid in a TASMAC Bar owned by the petitioner, it was foundthat 11 Liquor bottles were found opened.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit thatthe petitioner is nothing todo with the alleged occurrence and he hasbeen falsely implicated in this case.
4. The learned Government Advocate (crl.side) would submit that whenthe respondent conducted a surprise raid in a Bar owned by thepetitioner, it was found that 11 Liquor bottles were found opened and theinvestigation is pending.
5. This Court, taking into consideration of the above said facts andcircumstances, is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatorybail. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail inthe event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned JudicialMagistrate, Pattukkottai and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to thesatisfaction of thelearned Magistrate concerned and on furthercondition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent daily at11.00 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and whenrequired. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulatedunder Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate withina period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made readyfailing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.
sd/-
30/12/2013
/ TRUE COPY /
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)
TO
1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PATTUKOTTAI, THANJAVUR DISTRICT.
2 -DO-THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THANJAVUR AT KUMBAKONAM.
3 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI.
4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PATTUKOTTAI P.E.W., THANJAVUR DISTRICT.
+1. CC to M/S.S.DEENADHAYALAN Advocate SR.No.64487
ORDER IN
CRL OP(MD) No.23588 of 2013
Date :30/12/2013
PBK 31/12/2013 2P/6C