Uttarakhand High Court
BA1/1047/2008 of SMT CHANDO @ CHANDRAWATI Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 26 December 2008
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated Nainital the 26th December, 2008 1st Bail Application No. 1047 of 2008 Order on the bail application of the accused. Smt. Chando @ Chandrawati W/o Shri Nathhu Singh ….Applicant Verus State of Uttarakhand ….Opposite Party
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated Nainital the 26[th] December, 2008 1[st] Bail Application No. 1047 of 2008 Order on the bail application of the accused.
Smt. Chando @ Chandrawati W/o Shri Nathhu Singh
….Applicant
State of Uttarakhand
Verus
….Opposite Party
In Case Crime No. 431 of 2008 U/s 304-B I.P.C. Police Station Kashipur District Udham Singh Nagar Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J.
Heard Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, Advocate for the applicant; Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the State; and perused the record.
After due consideration of the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties; perusal of the statement of Arif Chaudhary, neighbour of the deceased; Shailbala, land lady of the deceased; the fact that the deceased and her husband were residing separately from her father-in-law; this fact has been admitted in the above statements of the witnesses; the fact that the present applicant is a lady (mother-in-law of the deceased); the fact that this is a case of parity; the learned Brief Holder did not dispute that it is not a case of parity; and the facts and circumstances of the case, it is a fit case for bail.
Let the accused/applicant be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate.
Dated 26.12.2008 Shiv
(J.C.S. Rawat, J.)