Uttarakhand High Court

WPSS/1597/2004 of RAJ KUMAR SINGH and ORS. Vs STATE and ORS. on 24 December 2004

(SS) 2004 Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J Heard Sri S.S. Chaudhary and Sri K. Ali learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel, Smt. Beena Pandey for respondents no. 2 and Sri D.S. Patni, learned counsel for the respondents no. 4 & 7. Learned counsel fro the petitioner has

WP No. 1597 (SS) 2004

Heard Sri S.S. Chaudhary and Sri K. Ali learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel, Smt. Beena Pandey for respondents no. 2 and Sri D.S. Patni, learned counsel for the respondents no. 4 & 7.

Learned counsel fro the petitioner has submitted that the question raised in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the judgement dated 5.10.2001 of this court passed in Writ Petition No. 860 (SB) of 2001 (Sukh Dev Vs. State of Uttaranchal and others).

Learned counsel for the respondents is also agreed that the case be decided in terms of aforesaid judgement provided that the options of the petitioners submitted before the Department are found to be genuine.

In view of the aforesaid statement, the writ petition is decided in terms of Judgement dated 5.10.2001 passed by this court is Writ Petition No. 860 (SB) of 2001 (Sukh Dev Vs. State of Uttaranchal and others) provided that the options of the petitioners submitted before the Department are found to be genuine.

24.12.2004 S.K.S

(M.M. Ghildiyal, J.)

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead