Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/23447/2013 of BANU @ SHARMILA BANU Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, on 30 December 2013
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.23447 of 2013 BANU @ SHARMILA BANU ..PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2 Vs. STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SUBRAMANIAPURAM
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand ThirteenPRESENTThe Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASHCRL OP(MD) No.23447 of 2013
BANU @ SHARMILA BANU ..PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2 Vs.
STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SUBRAMANIAPURAM POLICE STATION,MADURAI CITY.(CR.NO.990 OF 2013)..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.R.GANDHI Advocate
For Respondent : Mr.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondentpolice for the alleged commission of offences punishable under Sections341, 294(b), 323, 355 and 506(i) of I.P.C. r/w Section 4 of Tamil NaduProhibition of Harassment of Women Act in crime No.990 of 2013 and seeksanticipatory bail.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit thatthe petitioner is nothing to do with the alleged commission of offenceand she has been falsely implicated in this case.
3. Learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that theoccurrence is suppose to have taken place in the month of November 2013and the FIR was registered on 20.12.2013 and no one sustained injury inthe alleged occurrence.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court isinclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly,the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrestor on her appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate,No.IV,Madurai, and on her executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees tenthousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfactionof the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that thepetitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when requiredfor the purpose of interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with thecondition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.
5. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistratewithin a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy madeready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 30/12/2013
/ TRUE COPY /https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)
TO1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.IV, MADURAI.2 -DO-THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI.3 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI.4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SUBRAMANIAPURAM POLICE STATION, MADURAI CITY.+1. CC to M/S.R.GANDHI Advocate SR.No.14 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.23447 of 2013 Date :30/12/2013PBK 02/01/2014 2P/6C