Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/24133/2016 of V.R.THANGARATHINAM Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 29 December 2016
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Ninth day of December Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice R.MAHADEVAN CRL OP(MD) No.24133 of 2016 V.R.THANGARATHINAM ... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REP.BY , THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CS CID
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Thursday, the Twenty Ninth day of December Two Thousand SixteenPRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice R.MAHADEVAN
V.R.THANGARATHINAM ... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED
Vs
THE STATE REP.BY ,
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CS CID POLICE STATION,MADURAI, CRIME NO.272 OF 2016 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.V.BALAJI Advocate
For Respondent : MR.P.KANDASAMY, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as sole accused, in CrimeNo.272 of 2016, on the file of the respondent police, apprehendsarrest at the hands of the respondent police for the allegedoffences punishable under Section 17 of TNK(RT) Order 1973 r/w 7(1)(a)(ii) of E.C.Act, 1955 and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learnedGovernment Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondent / State.
3. The case of the prosecution is that on 21.12.2016, at about10.25 a.m., the petitioner was found in illegal possession of 25Litres of Kerosene.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted thatproperties have been recovered.
5. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submittedthat the petitioner has not committed any such offence and he hasnothing to do with present case and he has been falsely implicatedin this case.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, thisCourt is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to bereleased on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance beforethe learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Madurai, and on hisexecuting a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only)with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of thelearned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that thepetitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30a.m., for a period of four weeks and thereafter as and when requiredfor interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the conditionstipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.
7. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistratewithin a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copymade ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail standsdismissed.
sd/-
29/12/2016
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.III, MADURAI.
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI.
3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
CS CID POLICE STATION, MADURAI,
4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECTUOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC to M/S.V.BALAJI Advocate SR.No.45
KRK/CM
CSL/SS-3/SAR-II/02.01.2017 : 2P/6C
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.24133 of 2016
Date :29/12/2016