Uttarakhand High Court
CLCON/276/2002 of SURESH KUMAR Vs M.S. GARBYAL and ANR. on 9 December 2002
of 2002 Hon. P.C.Verma, J. Hon. M.M.Ghildiyal, J. Heard Sri C.D.Bahuguna, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel. Since the order pursuant to which the petitioner is seeking relieving has been cancelled as stated in para 7 of the counter affidavit, therefore, the petition
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
Heard Sri C.D.Bahuguna, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel.
Since the order pursuant to which the petitioner is seeking relieving has been cancelled as stated in para 7 of the counter affidavit, therefore, the petition has been rendered infructuous. As such, the petition is dismissed being infructuous.
(M.M.Ghildiyal,J.) (P.C.Verma, J.)
A