Madras High Court
AS/209/1986 of Vs on 21 November 2002
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT %DATED: 01.03.2019 *CORAM THE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
?BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT%DATED: 01.03.2019
*CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
+W.P.(MD)No.2928 of 2019
#T.Vijayakumari ... Petitioner
Vs
$1.Superintendent of Engineer,Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,Meenakshi Nayakkanpatti,Dindigul District.
2.Executive Engineer,Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,Sub Electric Station Campus,Ottanchatram, Dindigul District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India toissue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to shift the electricconsidering the petitioner-s representation dated 01.02.2019.
!For Petitioner : Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh^For Respondents : Mr.SMS.Johnny Basha
:ORDER
Heard the learned counsel on either side.
2. The writ petitioner wants this Court to direct the respondents toshift the transformer that has been installed near the petitioner-s land.This Court cannot direct the respondents to locate the transformer inquestion at a particular site. It is a matter to be decided entirely by therespondents. However, the respondents can be directed to dispose of thepetitioner-s representation dated 01.02.2019 on merits and in accordance withlaw.
3. With the above observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. Nocosts.