Madras High Court

CRL OP(MD)/23486/2013 of B. MANIKANDA PRABHU Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2013

Cites 0, Cited by 0

BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.23486 of 2013 B. MANIKANDA PRABHU ... PETITIONER / SOLE ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE GANESH NAGAR

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )

Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand ThirteenPRESENT

The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH

CRL OP(MD) No.23486 of 2013

B. MANIKANDA PRABHU ... PETITIONER / SOLE ACCUSED

Vs

THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE GANESH NAGAR POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI DT, CRIME NO.508/2013 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

For Petitioner : M/S.K. BAALASUNDHARAM Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.P.Balasubramani Government Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who was remanded to the judicial custody by therespondent police on 10.12.2013 for the alleged offence under Sections294(b), 352 and 506(II) of IPC in Crime No.508 of 2013 on the file of therespondent police, seeks bail.

2. It is the case of the prosecution that the petitioner abused andattacked the defacto complainant with hands on 10.12.2013.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that thepetitioner is an innocent and he did not commit any such offence.

4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the complainant, who come to court as witness in a case, was attacked by thehttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/petitioner at court building itself and he would further submit that noone sustained injury.

5. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and thelearned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State and alsoperused the materials available on record.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case this Court isinclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail on the following conditions.

Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) withtwo sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learnedJudicial Magistrate, Pudukkottai, and on further condition that thepetitioner appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m untilfurther orders sd/- 30/12/2013

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar

TO

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PUDUKOTTAI.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PUDUKOTTAI.

3 THE OFFICER IN-CHARGE, DISTRICT PRISON, PUDUKOTTAI.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

5 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE

GANESH NAGAR POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S.K. BAALASUNDHARAM Advocate SR.No.64435.

TS/30.12.2013/2P-7C

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

IN

CRL OP(MD) No.23486 of 2013

Date :30/12/2013

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead