Uttarakhand High Court
WPCRL/2430/2022 of GAJENDRA SINGH Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 23 December 2022
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL No. 2430 of 2022 Shri Sanjaya Kumar Mishra, J. Mr. Mohd Safdar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. J. S. Virk, learned Deputy Advocate General
|**SL.**<br>**No.**|**Date**|**Office Notes,**<br>**reports, orders or**<br>**proceedings or**<br>**directions and**<br>**Registrar’s order**<br>**with Signatures**||**COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS**| |---|---|---|---|---| |||||WPCRL No. 2430 of 2022<br>**Shri Sanjaya Kumar Mishra, J.**<br>Mr. Mohd Safdar, learned counsel for the<br>petitioner.<br>Mr. J. S. Virk, learned Deputy Advocate<br>General for the State.<br>It is apparent from the records that there<br>are several cases against the petitioner<br>including 07 criminal cases in the State of Uttar<br>Pradesh involving under Section 307 and 302<br>of I.P.C. Though, it is stated by the learned<br>counsel for the petitioner that he has been<br>acquitted in three of them, but no judgment or<br>certified copy of that order is annexed to this<br>writ petition.<br>Moreover, there are two other criminal<br>cases pending against the present petitioner in<br>the State of Uttarakhand, hence this Court is of<br>the opinion that even though, the petitioner has<br>not been named in the F.I.R. No. 106 of 2022<br>dated 31.01.2022 under Section 2(b) (i),<br>2(b)(xi) & 3 of U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social<br>Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, the police<br>can investigate into the matter regarding his<br>involvement as a gangster.<br>Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed<br>being devoid of merits.<br> **(Sanjaya Kumar Mishra, J.)**<br>23.12.2022<br>(Grant urgent certified copy of this order, as per Rules)<br>A/-|
Page 1 of 1
Loading citations and judicial treatment…