Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/23471/2013 of VISWANATHAN Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2013
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.23471 of 2013 VISWANATHAN ... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE AVADIYARKOVIL POLICE
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand ThirteenPRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH
CRL OP(MD) No.23471 of 2013
VISWANATHAN
... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED
Vs
THE STATE REP BYTHE INSPECTOR OF POLICE AVADIYARKOVIL POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT
CRIME NO.172/2013 ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.K.BAALASUNDHARAM AdvocateFor Respondent : M/S.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehending arrest at the hands of therespondent police for the alleged commission of offences punishableunder Sections 506(i) IPC and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibitionof Harassment of Women Act in crime No.172 of 2013 and seeksanticipatory bail.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submitthat due to money dispute between the petitioner and the de-factocomplainant, a case has been registered on 25.12.2013. He wouldfurther submit that the petitioner has nothing to do with thealleged commission of offence and he has been falsely implicated inthis case.
3. Learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would oppose thegrant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, thisCourt is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in thehttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned JudicialMagistrate, Aranthangi, and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for alike sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned andon further condition that the petitioner shall appear before therespondent police every day at 10.30 a.m. for a period of two weeks.The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated underSection 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.
5. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistratewithin a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copymade ready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail standsdismissed.
sd/-
30/12/2013
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE ARANTHANGI
2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE PUDUKOTTAI DISTRICT
3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI
4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE AVADIYARKOVIL POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT
+1. CC to M/S.K.BAALASUNDHARAM Advocate SR.No.64437RL/6 C- 2/1/2014
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.23471 of 2013
Date :30/12/2013