WPSS/3695/2017 of Vinay Padaliya AND OTHERS Vs State Of Uttarakhand AND OTHERS on 29 December 2017

Conclusion

WPSS No. 3695 of 2017

U.C.Dhyani, J.

Mr. P. C. Maulekhi, Advocate, present for the petitioner.

Mr. M. C. Tiwari, learned Deputy Advocate General, present for the State/ respondents no. 1 & 4.

Mr. Rakesh Thapaliyal, Advocate with Mr. Pankaj Chaturvedi, present for the respondents no. 2 & 3.

By means of present writ petition, the [petitioner seeks following relief, among others:

“Issue a writ, order or direction of mandamus directing the respondents to pay entire arrear of revised pension and other benefits to the petitioners since 01.01.2006 to 15.01.2015 with interest in accordance with 6[th] Pay Commission and further direct the respondents to give the benefit of 7[th] Pay Commission to the petitioners.”

After arguing the writ petition at some length, learned counsel for the petitioners confined his prayer only to the extent that respondent no. 2 may kindly be directed to decide petitioners’ representation, to which, learned counsel for the respondents have no objection.

Present writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent no. 2 to decide the representation of the petitioners by passing a reasoned and speaking order, at an earliest possible but not later than three weeks of presentation of certified copy of this Order alongwith a fresh representation.

Needless to say that decision so taken shall be communicated to the petitioner soon thereafter.

Let a copy of this order be supplied to the learned counsel for the petitioner today itself on paymen[t of usu]al charges.

(U.C.Dhyani, J.)

29.12.2017