Uttarakhand High Court

WPMS/17762/1999 of PREM LAL VERMA Vs STATE and OTHERS on 1 January 1950

UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1000 (MS) of 2001 (Old No. 17762/1999) Prem Lal Verma …… Petitioners Vs State of U.P. and others ……. Respondents Counsel for the petitioner Sh. B.D. Upadhyay Standing Counsel for the respondents. Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon J.

HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITALWrit Petition No. 1000 (MS) of 2001 (Old No. 17762/1999)

Prem Lal Verma

…… Petitioners

Vs

State of U.P. and others ……. Respondents Counsel for the petitioner Sh. B.D. Upadhyay Standing Counsel for the respondents.

Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon J.

Heard Sh. B.D. Upadhyay learned counsel for the petitioner and Standing Counsel for the respondents.

By the present writ petition the petitioner has prayed for regularization in terms of the G.O. dt. 12-9-1975. The petitioner has submitted that the G.O has not been considered by the Collector. The judgment of Hon’ble Mr. Justice B.L. Yadav in W.P. No.10030 of 1981 Hardev Singh Vs. State of U.P. has also been referred.

Liberty is given to the petitioner to approach the collector along with the G.O. as well as the judgment of Hon’ble Mr. Justice B.L. Yadav. The Collector shall dispose of the representation of the petitioner by a reasoned order.

Subject to the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.

Dated:- 25.8.2004.

M.K.

(RAJESH TANDON J.)

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead