Uttarakhand High Court
CLCON/86/2017 of Hem Chandra Lohni Vs MR. RANVEER SINGH CHAUHAN on 31 December 2020
86 of 2017 Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J. (Via Video Conferencing) Mr. B.M. Pingal, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. R.C. Arya, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. This contempt petition was preferred by the applicant seeking enforcement of the judgment dated 05.12.2014 which
CLCON No. 86 of 2017
Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.
(Via Video Conferencing)
Mr. B.M. Pingal, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr. R.C. Arya, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.
This contempt petition was preferred by the applicant seeking enforcement of the judgment dated 05.12.2014 which was rendered in Writ Petition No. 116 of 2014 ‘Hem Chandra Lohni vs. State of Uttarakhand and Others’, whereby, the respondent was directed to consider the claim of the petitioner for promotion to Class-III post.
The respondent has filed an affidavit, wherein, he has placed on record an order of 20.04.2017, which shows that the claim of the petitioner was considered and he has already granted the promotion.
In view of the said fact, which remained undenied by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this contempt petition is closed. Notice issued to the respondent is hereby discharged.
Pooja
(Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.) 31.12.2020
Page 1 of 1
Loading citations and judicial treatment…