Uttarakhand High Court

CLCON/86/2017 of Hem Chandra Lohni Vs MR. RANVEER SINGH CHAUHAN on 31 December 2020

86 of 2017 Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J. (Via Video Conferencing) Mr. B.M. Pingal, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. R.C. Arya, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. This contempt petition was preferred by the applicant seeking enforcement of the judgment dated 05.12.2014 which

CLCON No. 86 of 2017

Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.

(Via Video Conferencing)

Mr. B.M. Pingal, Advocate for the applicant.

Mr. R.C. Arya, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.

This contempt petition was preferred by the applicant seeking enforcement of the judgment dated 05.12.2014 which was rendered in Writ Petition No. 116 of 2014 ‘Hem Chandra Lohni vs. State of Uttarakhand and Others’, whereby, the respondent was directed to consider the claim of the petitioner for promotion to Class-III post.

The respondent has filed an affidavit, wherein, he has placed on record an order of 20.04.2017, which shows that the claim of the petitioner was considered and he has already granted the promotion.

In view of the said fact, which remained undenied by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this contempt petition is closed. Notice issued to the respondent is hereby discharged.

Pooja

(Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.) 31.12.2020

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead