Uttarakhand High Court
BA1/1168/2003 of TAHIR Vs STATE on 18 December 2003
COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital: the 18th day of December 2003 Bail application no. 1168 of 2003 Order on the bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Tahir S/o Sri Asgar R/o Kamroo, P.S. Mooda Pandey District Moradabad ... Applicant Versus State of
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
Dated: Nainital: the 18th day of December 2003
Bail application no. 1168 of 2003 Order on the bail application of accused.
CRIMINAL SIDE
Tahir S/o Sri Asgar R/o Kamroo, P.S. Mooda Pandey District Moradabad
... Applicant
Versus
State of Uttaranchal
... Opposite Party
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Arising out of case crime no. 739 of 2003 Under Sections 392/411 I.P.C. P.S. Kashipur District Udham Singh Nagar By the court Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and Sri C.K. Sharma learned counsel for the complainant.
The learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that there is no public witness. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case it is a fit case for bail.
public witness. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case Let the applicant Tahir be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Udham Singh Nagar.
bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction 18.12.2003 (M.M. Ghildiyal, J.) ASWAL