Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/23529/2013 of ARASAN Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2013
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr. Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.23529 of 2013 1 ARASAN 2 DEIVENDRAN 3 KUMAR ... PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED Nos. 1 to 3 Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MELAVALAVU
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand ThirteenPRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr. Justice P.N.PRAKASH
CRL OP(MD) No.23529 of 2013
1 ARASAN
2 DEIVENDRAN
3 KUMAR ... PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED Nos. 1 to 3
Vs
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MELAVALAVU POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.CRIME NO.152/2013 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S. M.SURESH Advocate
For Respondent : Mr.A.P.Balasubramani, Government Advocate(Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondentpolice for the alleged commission of offences under Sections 294(b), 323and 506(i) of IPC., in Crime No.152 of 2013, seek anticipatory bail.
2. It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for thepetitioners that the accused were in drunken mood and the defactocomplainant was also in drunken mood and all of them were playing cardsand in the course of it, there was a misunderstanding between them andthe accused said to have assaulted the defacto complainant with woodenstick.
3. The learned Government Advocate (crl.side) would submit thatinvestigation is pending and the injured has been discharged from thehospital.
4. This Court, taking into consideration of the above said facts andcircumstances, is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatorybail. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bailin the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learnedJudicial Magistrate, Melur and on executing a bond for a sum ofRs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a likesum to the satisfaction of thelearned Magistrate concerned and onhttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondentdaily at 11.00 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as andwhen required. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.
5. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistratewithin a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy madeready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.
sd/-
30/12/2013
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MELUR, MADURAI.
2 do-thro' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI
3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
MELAVALAVU POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.
4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC to M/S. M. SURESH Advocate SR.No.64485
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.23529 of 2013
Date :30/12/2013
gdr 31.12.2013 2p/6C