Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/23536/2013 of MADHAN KUMAR Vs THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2013
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.23536 of 2013 MADHAN KUMAR ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.2 Vs STATE REP BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE KALAKKADU POLICE
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH
CRL OP(MD) No.23536 of 2013
MADHAN KUMAR ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.2
Vs
STATE REP BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE KALAKKADU POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI, TIRUNELVELI DIST.
CR.NO.216 OF 2013 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.S.SENTHILSANKARANATHAKUMAR AdvocateFor Respondent : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/A1 apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondentpolice, for the alleged commission of offences punishable under Sections420, 465, 468, 471 and 506(ii) IPC, in Crime No. 216 of 2013 on the fileof the respondent police, seeks bail.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit thatA1 is the second son of the defacto complainant and petitioner/A2 haspurchased some of the lands belonging to A1. The case of the defactocomplainant is that A1 is trying to sell the property belonging todefacto complainant. It is further submitted that A1 has already beengranted anticipatory bail by this Court in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.19908 of 2013by order dated 08.11.2013.
3. Heard the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) on the abovesubmissions.
4. This Court, taking into consideration of the above facts andcircumstances of the case, enlarges the petitioner on anticipatory bailwith certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to bereleased on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before thelearned Judicial Magistrate, Nanguneri, and on executing a bond for a sumof Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for alike sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and onfurther condition that the petitioner shall report before the respondentpolice daily at 11.00 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter, ashttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/and when required by the respondent police. The petitioner shall complywith the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.
5. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate withina period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready,failing which the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 30/12/2013
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NANGUNERI
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUNELVELI
3 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
4 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE KALAKKADU POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI
AA/03.01.2014/ 2p- 5c/
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.23536 of 2013
Date :30/12/2013