Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/17080/2011 of SUBRAMANIAN Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 28 December 2011
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT (Criminal Jurisdiction) Wednesday, the Twenty Eighth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S. RAJESWARAN CRL OP(MD)No.17080 of 2011 SUBRAMANIAN :PETITIONER / ACCUSED (RANK NOT KNOWN) -Vs- THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CITY
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
(Criminal Jurisdiction)
Wednesday, the Twenty Eighth day of December Two Thousand ElevenPRESENTThe Hon`ble Mr.Justice S. RAJESWARANCRL OP(MD)No.17080 of 2011
SUBRAMANIAN :PETITIONER / ACCUSED (RANK NOT KNOWN)
-Vs-
THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,CITY CRIME BRANCH, TIRUNELVELI, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2011:RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S. S.RAGAVENTHRE AdvocateFor Respondent : MR.C.RAMESH, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR.
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-The petitioner, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondentpolice, for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 465, 467, 420 ofIPC, on the file of the respondent police,has approached this court foranticipatory bail under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.2.Heard Mr.S.Ragaventhre, learned counsel for the petitioner andMr.C.Ramesh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State.3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the Statesubmits that petition enquiry is pending against the petitioner before therespondent police and the petitioner is cooperating with the respondentpolice.
4.In view of the submission made by the learned Additional PublicProsecutor and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I aminclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, of course, subject tocertain stringent conditions.
5.Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on anticipatorybail, in the event of his arrest or on his appearance before the JudicialMagistrate concerned, on executing bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees TenThousand Only with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction ofthe learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tirunelveli, and on furtherconditionthat the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police dailyat 10.30 a.m., for a period of three weeks.
6.The petitioner shall appear before the Magistrate concerned within aperiod of 15 days, failing which, the anticipatory bail granted shall standautomatically cancelled.
28/12/2011
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)
TO:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The Judicial Magistrate No:I, Tirunelveli.
2.-Do- Thro' The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tirunelveli.3.The Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/4.The Inspector of Police,City Crime Branch,Tirunelveli,Tirunelveli District+1CC to M/S. S.RAGAVENTHRE Advocate SR.No.46182.RP/29.12.2011/1P/6C. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.17080 of 2011, Date:28/12/2011