Gujarat High Court
SCA/561/1994 of GODHRA SARVAJANIK SHIKSHAN MANDAL Vs REGIONAL PR0VIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER on 18 August 1994
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 561 of 1994 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 561 of 1994
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE
============================================================
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
-------------------------------------------------------------- GODHRA SARVAJANIK SHIKSHAN MANDALVersus REGIONAL PR0VIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR MB PARIKH for Petitioner MR JD AJMERA for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE Date of decision: 08/10/97
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
For the reasons and grounds given out in the judgment delivered today by this Court in Special Civil Application No.8070 of 1992, this Special Civil Application is not maintainable and the same is dismissed only on the ground of availability of statutory remedy of appeal against the impugned order.
2. In this case, I do not find that any interim relief has been granted by this Court. In the result, this Special Civil Application fails and the same is dismissed. It is hereby ordered that in case the petitioner files an appeal against the impugned order within one month from today, before the appellate tribunal, under section 7-I of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, the same may not be dismissed only on the ground of limitation and shall be decided on merits by the appellate tribunal. Rule discharged subject to aforesaid directions. No order as to costs.
.......
(sunil)