Madras High Court

CRL OP(MD)/23561/2013 of CHANDRASEKARAN Vs THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2013

Cites 0, Cited by 0

BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.23561 of 2013 CHANDRASEKARAN ... PETITIONER/ SOLE ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REP. BY THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE PASUPATHIPALAYAM

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )

Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand ThirteenPRESENT

The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH

CRL OP(MD) No.23561 of 2013

CHANDRASEKARAN ... PETITIONER/ SOLE ACCUSED

Vs

THE STATE REP. BY THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE PASUPATHIPALAYAM POLICE STATION, KARUR DT. CR. NO. 527/2103. ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

For Petitioner : M/S.P.MUTHUSAMY Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.P.Balasubramani Government Advocate ( Crl. Side)

PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who was remanded to the judicial custody by therespondent police on 22.11.2013 for the alleged offence under Sections294(b), 323, 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.527 of 2013 on the file of therespondent police, seeks bail.

2. It is the case of the prosecution that the defacto complainant isan Advocate and the petitioner is client and the petitioner abused thedefacto complainant with filth language and threatened him.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that thepetitioner has been in judicial custody from 22.11.2013 and he prays forbail.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that there is noserious injury to anybody.

5. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and thelearned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State and alsoperused the materials available on record.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case this Court isinclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail on the following conditions.Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail onhttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) withtwo sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Karur, and on further condition that thepetitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.muntil further orders.

sd/- 30/12/2013 / TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar

TO

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.I KARUR.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE , KARUR.

3 THE OFFICER IN-CHARGE, SUB JAIL, KARUR.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

5 THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE PASUPATHIPALAYAM POLICE STATION, KARUR DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S.P.MUTHUSAMY Advocate SR.No.64380.

TS/30.12.2013/2P-7C

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

IN

CRL OP(MD) No.23561 of 2013

Date :30/12/2013

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead