Madras High Court

CRL OP(MD)/19613/2019 of G.Sudha Vs The Inspector of Police on 30 December 2019

Cites 0, Cited by 0

No.19613 of 2019 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 30/12/2019 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice T.KRISHNAVALLI CRL OP(MD). No.19613 of 2019 G.SUDHA ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.2 VS STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KEELVALVOO POLICE STATION, MADURAI

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice T.KRISHNAVALLI

G.SUDHA... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.2

VS

STATE REP. BYTHE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,KEELVALVOO POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.(CRIME NO.350/2019).... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C

PRAYER :-

For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.350 of 2019 on the file ofthe respondent.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondentpolice for the alleged offences punishable under sections 147, 341,294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.350 of 2019 on thefile of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner is thewife of the defacto complainant. Due to the family dispute thepetitioner along with other accused assaulted the defactocomplainant and caused injuries. Hence, the complaint.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that thepetitioner is an innocent person and she has not committed anyhttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/offence as alleged by the prosecution.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for theState, on instructions, submitted that the injured has beendischarged from the hospital.

5.Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case andalso considering the fact that the injured has been discharged fromthe hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail tothe petitioner with certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bailin the event of arrest or on her appearance before the learnedMunsif, Melur and on her executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) along with two sureties each for a likesum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and thepetitioner shall appear before the learned Munsif, Melur daily at10.00 a.m and 05.00 pm, until further orders. The petitioner shallcomply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C.scrupulously.

7.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistratewithin a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copymade ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail standsdismissed.

30/12/2019

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1 THE MUNSIF, MELUR.

2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

KEELVALVOO POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.

3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,

MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1 CC to M/s.S.ARUNNITHY, Advocate ( SR-54[I] dated 02/01/2020 )

ORDER

MSA/RMKhttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/JM/PN/SAR 2/03.01.2020/2P/5C

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead