Madras High Court

CRL OP(MD)/17058/2011 of SHANMUGAM Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 28 December 2011

Cites 0, Cited by 0

BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Eighth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S. RAJESWARAN CRL OP(MD) No.17058 of 2011 SHANMUGAM ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ANTI LAND GRABING CELL,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )

Wednesday, the Twenty Eighth day of December Two Thousand ElevenPRESENT

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S. RAJESWARAN

CRL OP(MD) No.17058 of 2011

SHANMUGAM

... PETITIONER/ACCUSED

THE STATE REP BYTHE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ANTI LAND GRABING CELL,PUDUKKOTTAI(CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2011) ..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

For Petitioner : M/S. P.GANAPATHI SUBRAMANIAN AdvocateFor Respondent : Mr.C.RAMESH, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of therespondent police for the alleged offence punishable underSections 417, 420, 467, 468, 473 & 506(ii) of IPC, on the fileof the respondent police, has approahced this Court foranticiptory bail under Section 438 of the Code of CriminalProcedure.

2.Heard Mr.P.Ganapathi Subramanian, learned counsel for thepetitioner and Mr.C.Ramesh, learned Additional Public Prosecutorappearing for the State.

3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for theState submits that petition enquiry is pending against thepetitioner before the respondent police and the petitioner isco-operating with the respondent police.

4.Recording the submission made by the learned AdditionalPublic Prosecutor and considering the facts and circumstances ofthe case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to thepetitioner, of course, object to certain stringent conditions.https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5.Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released onanticipatory bail , in the event of his arrest or on hisappearance before the Judicial Magistrate concerned, onexecuting bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfactionof the learned Judicial Magistrate, Pudukottai, and on furthercondition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondentpolice daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of three weeks.

6.The petitioner shall appear before the Magistrateconcerend within a period of 15 days, failing which, theanticipatory bail granted shall stand automaticaally cancelled.

sd/-

28/12/2011

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE PUDUKKOTTAI

2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT

3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ANTI LAND GRABING CELL,PUDUKKOTTAI, rl/5c – 2.1.2012

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

IN

CRL OP(MD) No.17058 of 2011

Date :28/12/2011

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead