Uttarakhand High Court
WPSB/773/2001 of RAKESH CHANDRA NAUTIYAL Vs CHANCELLOR H.N.B. GARHWAL UNIVERSITY and ORS. on 26 December 2007
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 773 of 2001 (S/B) Rakesh Chandra Nautiyal S/o Late Sri K.R. Nautiyal, Reader, Education Department, Hemwati Nandan Bahuguna Garhwal University, STR Constituent College, Badshahi Thaul, Tehri, Tehri Garhwal, R/o C-24, Professors Colony, Badshahi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Writ Petition No. 773 of 2001 (S/B)
Rakesh Chandra Nautiyal S/o Late Sri K.R. Nautiyal, Reader, Education Department, Hemwati Nandan Bahuguna Garhwal University, STR Constituent College, Badshahi Thaul, Tehri, Tehri Garhwal, R/o C-24, Professors Colony, Badshahi Thaul, Tehri, Tehri Garhwal. ……..
…….. Petitioner
Versus
1. The Chancellor,
Hemwati Nandan Bahuguna Garhwal University, Srinagar Garhwal, Raj Bhawan, Dehradun. Dehradun.
2. Vice-Chancellor,
Hemwati Nandan Bahuguna Garhwal University, Srinagar Garhwal.
3. Registrar,
Hemwati Nandan Bahuguna Garhwal University, Srinagar Garhwal. Srinagar Garhwal.
4. Dr. Govind Singh Aswal S/o Sri Hardayal Singh Aswal, Reader, Education Department, Reader, Education Department, Hemwati Nandan Bahuguna Garhwal University, STR Constituent College, Badshahi Thaul, Tehri, Tehri Garhwal.
……… Respondents
None for the petitioner. Mr. Ashish Joshi, Advocate on behalf of Mr. J.P. Joshi, Advocate for respondents Nos. 2 & 3. None for respondent No. 4. Mr. Bhagwat Mehra, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Manoj Tiwari, Advocate for the Interveners.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J.
RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral)
Petition’s counsel absent.
Mr. Ashish Joshi, Advocate on behalf of Mr. J.P. Joshi, Advocate for respondents Nos. 2 & 3.
None for respondent No. 4.
Mr. Bhagwat Mehra, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Manoj Tiwari, Advocate for the Interveners.
2. As there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, we are left with no other option but to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution.
3. The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed for want of prosecution.
4. Consequently, the interim order dated 03.07.2001 stands vacated automatically.
G
(J.C.S. Rawat, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C. J.) 26.12.2007 26.12.2007