Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/23525/2013 of S.ABU PAKKAR SIDDIQ Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2013
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.23525 of 2013 1 S.ABU PAKKAR SIDDIQ 2 RAHEEMA BEEVI 3 HABEEBULLA ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO. 1, 2 & 7 Vs STATE REP BY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH
CRL OP(MD) No.23525 of 2013
1 S.ABU PAKKAR SIDDIQ
2 RAHEEMA BEEVI
3 HABEEBULLA ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO. 1, 2 & 7
Vs
STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, ALANGUDI, PUDUKOTTAI DIST.
CR. NO.6/2013. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.A.K.MANICKAM AdvocateFor Respondent : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondentpolice for the alleged commission of offences under Section 506(i)., andSection 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, in Crime No.6 of 2013,seekanticipatory bail.
2. In so far as the first petitioner/ A1 is concerned, the learnedcounsel for the petitoner makes an endorsement to the effect that he isnot pressing the petition in respect of him. Hence, this petition isdismissed in respect of first petitioner/A1.
3. It is alleged by the prosecution that marriage was solemnisedbetween the defacto complainant and the first accused and it was calledoff due to demand of dowry by the petitioners.
4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submitthat the marriage was called of only due to age diference between hisbride and bridegroom and not due to demand of dowry and the petitionershave been falsely implicated in this case.
5. The learned Government Advocate (crl.side) would submit thatinvestigation is pending.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
6. This Court, taking into consideration of the above said facts andcircumstances and also considering the fact that the second petitioner/A2
is aged about 83 years old lady and the 3[rd] petitioner/A7 is a relative ofthe bridegroom and thereis no serious overact attributed against them, isinlcined to enlarge the 2[nd] and 3[rd] petitioners/A2 and A7 on anticipatorybail. Accordingly, the 2[nd] and 3[rd] petitioners/A2 and A7 are ordered to bereleased on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance beforethe learned Judicial Magistrate, Alangudi, Pudukkottai District, and onexecuting a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) withtwo sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of thelearnedMagistrate concerned and on further condition that the 2[nd] and 3[rd]petitioners/A2 and A7 shall appear before the respondent as and whenrequired. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulatedunder Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.7. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistratewithin a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy madeready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 30/12/2013
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ALANGUDI, PUDUKKOTTAI2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE PUDUKKOTTAI3 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, ALANGUDI, PUDUKOTTAI. CR. NO.6/2013.
+1. CC to M/S.A.K.MANICKAM Advocate SR.No.64438
AA/02.01.2014/ 2p- 6c/
ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.23525 of 2013 Date :30/12/2013