Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/17976/2017 of SULAIMAN @ SYED SULAIMAN Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 28 December 2017
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Eighth day of December Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice S.VAIDYANATHAN CRL OP(MD) No.17976 of 2017 SULAIMAN @ SYED SULAIMAN ... PETITIONER/ PETITIONER Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Thursday, the Twenty Eighth day of December Two Thousand SeventeenPRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice S.VAIDYANATHAN
CRL OP(MD) No.17976 of 2017
SULAIMAN @ SYED SULAIMAN ... PETITIONER/ PETITIONER Vs STATE REP.BYTHE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TENKASI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. CRIME NO.727/2006... RESPONDENT/ RESPONDENT
For Petitioner : M/S.R.VENKATESAN, Advocate For Respondent : M/S.K.ANBARASAN, Government Advocate(Crl.Side)
PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicialcustody for the offences punishable under Sections 120(B), 324, 302r/w 34 IPC in Crime No.727 of 2006 on the file of the respondentpolice, seeks bail.
2. On 24.12.2017, this Court has granted parole to thepetitioner till 27.12.2017 on account of the emergent situation,viz., death of his father and now, it is represented by both thelearned counsel for the petitioner and the learned GovernmentAdvocate (Crl.Side) that the petitioner has already been taken intocustody on the expiry of the parole period as stipulated by thisCourt.
3. At this juncture, the learned counsel for the petitioner hassubmitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in thiscase and therefore, the petitioner may be granted the relief ofbail.
4. However, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) hasstrongly objected to the grant of bail, contending that thepetitioner has indulged in serious offences.
5. Taking into consideration the serious nature of theallegations levelled against this petitioner and the fact that thehttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/petitioner is a remand prisoner, this Court is not inclined to grantthe relief as prayed for by the petitioner.
6. In the result, this Criminal Original Petition standsdismissed accordingly. sd/- 28/12/2017 / TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO1. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TENKASI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT,CENTRAL PRISON, PALAYAMKOTTAI.
3. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.17976 of 2017
Date :28/12/2017
MS/CM-VR/SAR.1/02.01.2018/2P.4C