Madras High Court
WP/34100/2017 of S.Manikandan, Vs The Inspector of Police on 28 December 2017
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 28.12.2017 CORAM THE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 28.12.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE R.PONGIAPPAN
W.P.No.34100 of 2017
S.Manikandan .. Petitioner
Vs
The Inspector of Police,Malayampalayam Police Station, Erode District... Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitutionof India, praying to issue a writ of Mandamus directing therespondent police to grant permission and protection forconducting the Dance Programe in the Pottusamy Amman Temple,festival in Sanar Palayam, Kilambadi Village, Pasur Post,Kodumudi Taluk, Erode District, dated 29.12.2017 (Friday) as perpetitioner's representation.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sathish Kumar
For Respondents : Mr.M.Elumalai
Government Advocate
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
This Writ Petition is filed seeking permission andprotection for conducting the Dance Program in the PottusamyAmman Temple, festival in Sanar Palayam, Kilambadi Village,Pasur Post, Kodumudi Taluk, Erode District, on 29.12.2017(Friday) as per petitioner's representation dated 22.12.2017. 2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitionerand the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent.
3. Admittedly, the petitioner has made a representation tothe respondent on 22.12.2017. Since, no action is taken, thepetitioner has preferred this petition seeking for grant ofpermission to conduct the cultural program, which is scheduledto be held on 29.12.2017.
4. Learned Government Advocate appearing for therespondent, admitted that so far no action has been taken todispose of the petitioner's representation.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
5. In view of the limited prayer sought for by thepetitioner, the respondent is directed to consider thepetitioner's representation dated 22.12.2017 and passappropriate orders before 8 a.m. on 29.12.2017.
6. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.
Sd/-Assistant Registrar(Admin II)//True copy//Sub Assistant RegistrarTo1. The Inspector of Police, Malayampalayam Police Station, Erode District.2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.W.P.No.34100 of 2017KAN(CO)GN(02/01/2018)