Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/23492/2013 of K.MARIA DAVID Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2013
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.23492 of 2013 K.MARIA DAVID ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs 1.STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE E3 ANNA NAGAR
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH
CRL OP(MD) No.23492 of 2013
K.MARIA DAVID ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs
1.STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE E3 ANNA NAGAR CRIME POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT2 THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE E3 ANNA NAGAR CRIME POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT. CRIME NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2013 ... RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANTS
For Petitioner : M/S. M. KUMAR AdvocateFor Respondent : M.S.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondentpolice for the alleged offence punishable under sections 406, 379and 506(ii) of I.P.C and seeks anticipatory bail.
2. Learned Government Advocate (crl. Side) submitted that basedon the complaint given by the de-facto complainant, petition enquiryis being conducted.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submittedthat it is a dispute between the Managing Director and the share-holder and in this regard, a civil case is also pending.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, thisCourt is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in thehttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned JudicialMagistrate No.VI, Madurai and on executing a bond for a sum ofRs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned andon further condition that the petitioner shall appear before therespondent police daily at 10.00 a.m for a period of two weeks andthereafter as and when required. The petitioner shall comply withthe condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.
5. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistratewithin a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copymade ready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail standsdismissed.
sd/- 30/12/2013 / TRUE COPY /
30/12/2013
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO
1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.VI MADURAI2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MADURAI DISTRICT 3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE E3 ANNA NAGAR CRIME POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT5.THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE E3 ANNA NAGAR CRIME POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT+1. CC to M/S. M. KUMAR Advocate SR.No.64396RL/7C – 2/1/2014
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.23492 of 2013
Date :30/12/2013