Madras High Court

CRL OP(MD)/23558/2013 of JANARTHANAN Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2013

Cites 0, Cited by 0

BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.23558 of 2013 T.JANARTHANAN ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MANAVALAKURICHI POLICE

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )

Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand ThirteenPRESENT

THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH

CRL OP(MD) No.23558 of 2013

T.JANARTHANAN ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2

Vs

THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MANAVALAKURICHI POLICE STATION, KANYAKUAMRI DISTRICT.

CRIME NO.240/2013. ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

FOR PETITIONER : M/S.K.SUDALAIYANDI ADVOCATEFOR RESPONDENT : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN GOVT. ADVOCATE ( CRL. SIDE)

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL UNDER SEC. 438 CR.P.C.

ORDER : THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER :- The petitioner/Accused No.2 apprehending arrest at the hands of therespondent police for the alleged commission offences punishable undersections 147, 341, 294(b) and 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.240 of 2013 onthe file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

3.The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) would submit thatno one is injured in this case.

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and alsoconsidering the fact that no one is injured in this case, this Court isinclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail.

5.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail inthe event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned JudicialMagistrate, Eraniel and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to thesatisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further conditionhttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required.The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C., scrupulously.

6.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready,failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/-

30/12/2013

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ERANIEL.

2.THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KANYAKUMARI AT NAGECOIL.

3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANAVALAKURICHI POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMRaI.

4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC TO M/S.K.SUDALAIYANDI ADVOCATE SR.NO.64379.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

IN

CRL OP(MD) No.23558 of 2013

Date :30/12/2013

2P/6CRPB 02.01.2014

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead