Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/18015/2017 of NAPOLEON Vs THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, on 28 December 2017
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Eighth day of December Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice S.VAIDYANATHAN CRL OP(MD) No.18015 of 2017 NAPOLEON ... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED Vs STATE, REP. BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AMMAPATTI POLICE
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Thursday, the Twenty Eighth day of December Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice S.VAIDYANATHAN
CRL OP(MD) No.18015 of 2017
NAPOLEON ... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED
Vs
STATE, REP. BYSUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AMMAPATTI POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT, CRIME NO.83/2017... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/s.P.KALAIYARASI BHARATHI Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.ANBARASAN, Government Advocate (Crl.side)
PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/Sole Accused, who was arrested on 14.12.2017 andremanded to judicial custody on the same day for the offencespunishable under Section 379 IPC r/w Section 21(1) of Mines andMinerals Act in Crime No.83 of 2017 on the file of the respondentpolice, seeks bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner issaid to have illegally transported two cement bags of river sand inhis two wheeler, which resulted in registration of the present case.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submittedthat the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and heis ready to abide by any conditions being imposed by this Court.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) has stronglyobjected to the grant of bail, contending that the investigation ofthe case is at the initial stage and if the petitioner/accused islet out on bail, there is every possibility of the accused tamperingthe witnesses/evidences and hampering the investigation.
5. Taking into consideration the serious nature of thehttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/allegations levelled against this petitioner and the fact that hewas taken into custody only from 14.12.2017, this Court is not inclined to grant the relief as prayed for by the petitioner.
6. In the result, this Criminal Original Petition standsdismissed accordingly.
sd/-
28/12/2017
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
AMMAPATTI POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT, 2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI
+1. CC to M/S.P.KALAIYARASI BHARATHI Advocate SR.No.37127
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.18015 of 2017
Date :28/12/2017
ar
SH/RR/SAR-3:02.01.2018:2p/4c